+高级检索
中国辩护律师追责体制的变革问题
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Reform of the Accountability System of Chinese Defense Lawyers
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    辩护律师追责二元体制有其历史演变的渊源和职业主义理论基石,该体制改革的现实基础有辩护律师规模扩张和身份转变、辩护律师刑事责任适用频繁和行政责任与纪律责任区分不明。在辩护律师追责范式的域外比较方面,美国的法院主导模式、德国的律协主导模式和日本的律协独享模式值得借鉴,律师协会完全自治缺乏普适性,由其享有部分监管权反映了现代法治国家分权治理的基本原则。辩护律师追责二元体制的改革路径包括二元体制下的司法化改革、实现宏观监管和微观追责相对独立、纪律责任与行政责任的有效衔接。辩护律师承担民事赔偿应纳入监管体系,实现从“二元”体制到“准三元”体制的转变,促进辩护律师追责体制的立体化。

    Abstract:

    Defense lawyers accountability for binary system has its historical evolution of the origin and the professional theory foundation, the reform is difficult to adapt to a defense lawyer scale expansion and identity change, lead to a defense lawyer criminal responsibility for frequent responsibility and administrative responsibility and discipline to distinguish the unknown aspects of realistic foundation. Outside of the defense attorney accountability paradigm comparison, the dominant modes of American court, Germany's jointed dominant mode, and the Japanese bar exclusive mode is worth reference, the all China lawyers association fully autonomous is lack of universality, which shall enjoy the right of some regulation reflecting the modern country under the rule of law, it is the basic principle of decentralized management. Defense lawyer accountability for the reform path of binary system including the binary system of judicial reform, implement macro regulation and micro accountability for relatively independent effective connection, discipline, responsibility and administrative responsibility. Necessary defense lawyers undertaking civil compensation should be brought into the regulatory system, it is realized from the dual system to quasi ternary system transformation, promoting the defense lawyer system of accountability for three-dimensional.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
文章指标
  • PDF下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 摘要点击次数:
  • 引用次数:
引用本文

谭 文 健.中国辩护律师追责体制的变革问题[J].湖南大学学报:自然科学版,2018,45(4):142~148

复制
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-08-14
  • 出版日期:
作者稿件一经被我刊录用,如无特别声明,即视作同意授予我刊论文整体的全部复制传播的权利,包括但不限于复制权、发行权、信息网络传播权、广播权、表演权、翻译权、汇编权、改编权等著作使用权转让给我刊,我刊有权根据工作需要,允许合作的数据库、新媒体平台及其他数字平台进行数字传播和国际传播等。特此声明。
关闭